Low* core libraries¶
Low* is made up of a few primitive libraries that enjoy first-class support in
KaRaMeL. These core libraries are typically made up of a model (an .fst
file) and an interface (an .fsti
file). Verification is performed against
the model, but at extraction-time, the model is replaced with primitive C
constructs.
The memory model¶
Beyond the language subset, one defining component of Low* is how it models the C memory.
The F* HyperHeap model¶
F* is by default equipped with HyperHeap, a hierarchical memory model that divides the heap into a tree of regions. This coarse-grained separation allows the programmer to state modifies clauses at the level of regions, rather than on individual references.
The HyperHeap memory model is described in the 2016 POPL paper, as well as the F* tutorial. We assume that the reader has a passing degree of familiarity with HyperHeap.
The HyperStack model¶
Low* refines the HyperHeap memory model, adding a distinguished set of regions that model the C call stack. Programs may use stack allocation, heap allocation or both. The HyperStack memory model offers a set of effects that capture the allocation behavior of functions.
The HyperStack memory model comprises the files
FStar.Monotonic.HyperStack.fst
, FStar.HyperStack.fst
and
FStar.HyperStack.ST.fst
in the ulib
directory of F*.
Note
Many verification errors point to definitions in these three files. Being familiar with these modules, their combinators and key concepts helps understand why a given program fails to verify.
Warning
We recommend always defining the ST
abbreviation at the beginning of
your module, in order to shadow the FStar.ST
module, which is not
Low*.
module ST = FStar.HyperStack.ST
module HS = FStar.HyperStack
The top-level region is the root, and is always a valid region. HS.rid
is the type of regions.
let root: HS.rid = HS.roo
Stack frames are modeled as distinguished regions that satisfy the
is_stack_region
predicate. Allocating in a stack frame, unsurprisingly,
results in a stack-allocated variable or array in C. Stack frames may be
de-allocated as program execution progresses up the call stack, meaning that
the underlying HyperHeap region may disappear.
Regions that are not stack frames may not be de-allocated, and therefore
satisfy the is_eternal_region
predicate. This includes the root
.
Allocating in one of these regions amounts to performing a heap allocation
in C.
Pushing a new stack frame amount to allocating a new stack region. In the
HyperHeap model, creating a new region requires a parent. Thus, when a
new stack frame is allocated, its parent is either the top-most stack frame,
or the root
if no stack frame has been allocated so far.
Warning
The root
is not a stack region and does not satisfy is_stack_region
.
let _ =
HS.root_is_not_freeable ();
assert (ST.is_eternal_region root /\ ~ (Monotonic.HyperStack.is_stack_region root))
The most popular effect is the Stack
effect, which takes:
- a precondition over the initial heap, of type
HS.mem -> Type
, and a - post-condition over the initial heap, the result, the final heap, of type
HS.mem -> a -> HS.mem -> Type
effect Stack (a:Type) (pre: ST.st_pre) (post: (m0: HS.mem -> Tot (ST.st_post' a (pre m0)))) =
STATE a
(fun (p: ST.st_post a) (h: HS.mem) ->
pre h /\ (forall a h1. (pre h /\ post h a h1 /\ ST.equal_domains h h1) ==> p a h1))
The relevant bit in this otherwise mundane definition is the
ST.equal_domains
predicate.
let equal_domains (m0 m1: HS.mem) =
(HS.get_tip m0) == (HS.get_tip m1) /\
Set.equal (Map.domain (HS.get_hmap m0)) (Map.domain (HS.get_hmap m1)) /\
ST.same_refs_in_all_regions m0 m1
The equal_domains
predicate states that a function in the Stack
effect:
- preserves the
tip
of the memory, i.e. calling this function leaves the C call stack intact; - does not allocate any new region on the heap, i.e. this is a C function that does not heap-allocate;
- does not allocate in any existing region, i.e. this is a C function that does not grow any existing stack frame on the call stack.
A function that satisfies these conditions is a function that can be safely compiled as a C function. In other words, using the native C call stack is a valid implementation of our model.
let f (x: UInt32.t): Stack UInt32.t (fun _ -> True) (fun _ _ _ -> True) =
FStar.UInt32.( x *%^ x )
Based on the knowledge above, consider the following failing function.
[@ expect_failure ]
let g (): Stack unit (fun _ -> True) (fun _ _ _ -> True) =
let b = B.alloca 0ul 8ul in
()
F* reports an assertion failure for the is_stack_region
predicate.
Indeed, the alloca
function requires that the tip
be a valid stack
region, which is false when no stack frame has been pushed on the call stack.
One important insight at this stage is that F* does not “automatically”
enrich the verification context with the assumption that upon entering
g
, we have pushed a new stack frame. This would be the wrong thing to do
for a total function; furthermore, there is simply no such support in the language.
Rather, the user is expected to manually indicate which operations need to
conceptually happen in a new stack frame. The Low* memory model provides two
combinators for this purpose: push_frame
and pop_frame
. The f
function did not need them, because it performed no stateful operation.
We can attempt to fix g
by adding a call to push_frame
.
[@ expect_failure ]
let g2 (): Stack unit (fun _ -> True) (fun _ _ _ -> True) =
push_frame ();
let b = B.alloca 0ul 8ul in
()
F* now reports an error for the equal_domains
predicate above. Indeed,
the only way to leave the C call stack intact, and therefore satisfy the
requirements of the Stack
effect, is to ensure we pop the stack
frame we just pushed.
let g3 (): Stack unit (fun _ -> True) (fun _ _ _ -> True) =
push_frame ();
let b = B.alloca 0ul 8ul in
pop_frame ();
()
g3
now successfully compiles to C:
void g3()
{
uint32_t b[8U] = { 0U };
}
The Stack
effect prevents heap allocation, hence ensuring that from the
caller’s perspective, any heap (“eternal”) regions remain unchanged.
For code that performs heap allocations, the libraries offer the ST
effect. It is similar to the Stack
effect, and takes the same form of
pre- and post-conditions, but allows heap allocation.
let g4 (): ST unit (fun _ -> True) (fun _ _ _ -> True) =
push_frame ();
let b = B.malloc HS.root 0ul 8ul in
pop_frame ();
()
The St
effect might occasionally be convenient.
effect St (a:Type) = ST a (fun _ -> True) (fun _ _ _ -> True)
One can reflect the memory as an HS.mem
at any program point, by using
ST.get ()
.
let test_st_get (): St unit =
push_frame ();
let m = ST.get () in
assert (Monotonic.HyperStack.is_stack_region (HS.get_tip m));
pop_frame ()
These are the basic building blocks of our memory model. Verifying on top of
this memory model involves reflecting the state of the memory at the proof
level, using the HS.mem
type, and capturing the effect of allocations,
updates and de-allocations using suitable pre- and post-conditions. This can
be done using a combination of modifies clauses and libraries that reflect
low-level constructs, such as buffers and machine integers, at the proof
level. All of these are covered in the rest of this chapter.
Advanced: the StackInline
effect¶
TODO
Machine integers¶
Machine integers are modeled as natural numbers that fit within a certain number of bits. This model is dropped by KaRaMeL, in favor of C’s fixed-width types.
Fixed-width integers are found in FStar.UInt{16,32,64,128}.fst
and
FStar.Int{16,32,64,128}
. The FStar.Int.Cast.Full.fst
module offers
conversion functions between these integer types.
Warning
By default, KaRaMeL relies on the non-standard unsigned __int128
C
type to implement FStar.UInt128.t
. This type is widely supported
across GCC and Clang versions, but not by the Microsoft compilers. If you
need 128-bit unsigned integers, consider reading
krmllib/README.md
, which offers both an MSVC-specific alternative,
and a portable, albeit slower, implementation.
Machine integers offer the classic set of arithmetic operations. Like in C,
unsigned integers have wraparound overflow semantics, exposed via the
add_mod
function. Signed integers offer no such function. Other
undefined behaviors of C are ruled out at the F* level, such as shifting an
integer by the bit width.
Note
In addition to classic arithmetic operations, some modules offer
constant-time operations such as eq_mask
and gte_mask
, which
allow defining a “secret integer” module on top of these integers, that
offers no comparison operator returning a boolean, to avoid timing leaks. See
the HACL* libraries for secret integers.
Machine integers modules also define operators, suffixed with ^
. For
instance, the +
operation for UInt32
is +^
. Wraparound variants
have an extra %
character, such as +%^
, when available.
Note
The unary minus is broken for machine integers.
This does not parse: let x = UInt32.(-^ 0ul)
Operators follow the standard precedence rules of F*, which are outlined on
its wiki.
Operators are resolved in the current scope; we recommend the use of module
abbreviations and the let-open notation M.( ... )
.
module U32 = FStar.UInt32
let z = U32.(16ul -^ 8ul )
Note
By default, operations require that the caller prove that the result fits in
the given integer width. For instance, U32.add
has (requires (size (v
a + v b) n))
as a precondition. Look at U32.add_modulo
for no
precondition.
Machine integers can be reflected as natural numbers of type nat
using
the v
function. It is generally more convenient to perform proofs on
natural numbers.
let test_v (): unit =
let x = 0ul in
assert (U32.v x = 0)
The buffer library¶
LowStar.Buffer
is the workhorse of Low*, and allows modeling C arrays on
the stack and in the heap. LowStar.Buffer
models C arrays as follows:
let lseq (a: Type) (l: nat) : Type =
(s: Seq.seq a { Seq.length s == l } )
noeq
type buffer (a:Type) =
| MkBuffer: max_length:UInt32.t
-> content:reference (lseq a (U32.v max_length))
-> idx:UInt32.t
-> length:UInt32.t{U32.(v idx + v length <= v max_length)}
-> buffer a
In other words, buffers are modeled as a reference to a sequence, along with
a starting index idx
, and a length
, which captures how much of an
allocation slice one is currently pointing to.
This is a model: at compilation-time, KaRaMeL implements buffers using C arrays.
The length is available in ghost (proof) code only: just like in C, one
cannot compute the length of a buffer at run-time. Therefore, a typical
pattern is to use refinements to tie together a buffer and its length, as we
saw with the initial memcpy
example.
let do_something (x: B.buffer UInt64.t) (l: U32.t { U32.v l = B.length x }): St unit =
()
Allocating a buffer on the stack is done using the alloca
function,
which takes an initial value and a length. alloca
requires that the top
of the stack be a valid stack frame.
let test_alloc_stack (): Stack unit (fun _ -> True) (fun _ _ _ -> True) =
push_frame ();
let b = B.alloca 0UL 8ul in
pop_frame ();
()
Allocating a buffer on the heap is done using the malloc
function,
which takes a region, an initial value and a length. The region is purely
for proof and separation purposes, and has no effect on the generated code. A
buffer created with malloc
can be freed with free
.
let test_alloc (): St unit =
let b = B.malloc HS.root 0UL 8ul in
B.free b
Pointer arithmetic is performed by the means of the sub
function. Under
the hood, the sub
function returns a buffer that points to the same
underlying reference, but has different idx
and length
fields.
let test_sub (): St unit =
let b = B.malloc HS.root 0UL 8ul in
let b_l = B.sub b 0ul 4ul in // idx = 0; length = 4
let b_r = B.sub b 4ul 4ul in // idx = 4; length = 4
B.free b
Just like in C, one can only free the base pointer, i.e. this is an error:
[@ expect_failure ]
let test_sub_error (): St unit =
let b = B.malloc HS.root 0UL 8ul in
let b_l = B.sub b 0ul 4ul in // idx = 0; length = 4
B.free b_l
Reading and modifying a buffer is performed by means of the index
and upd
functions. These are exposed as the .()
and .()<-
operators respectively, defined in LowStar.BufferOps
. This latter module
module only contains those operators, and is meant to be used with
open
to bring operators into scope without further polluting the
context with any definition from LowStar.Buffer
.
let test_index (): St unit =
let b = B.malloc HS.root 0UL 8ul in
b.(0ul) <- UInt64.add_mod b.(0ul) b.(0ul);
B.free b
Buffers are reflected at the proof level using sequences, via the as_seq
function, which returns the contents of a given buffer in a given heap, i.e.
a sequence slice ranging over the interval [idx; idx + length)
.
let test_as_seq (): St unit =
let b = B.malloc HS.root 0UL 1ul in
let h = ST.get () in
assert (Seq.equal (B.as_seq h b) (Seq.cons 0UL Seq.createEmpty));
B.free b
B.get
is an often-convenient shorthand to index the value of a
given buffer in a given heap.
let test_get (): St unit =
let b = B.malloc HS.root 0UL 1ul in
let h = ST.get () in
assert (B.get h b 0 = 0UL);
B.free b
C NULL pointers
LowStar.Buffer
also exposes a model of the C NULL pointer, null
–
this is what you should use if you need zero-length buffers. The NULL
pointer is always live, and always has length 0. The pointer
and
pointer_or_null
functions define convenient aliases, while the (!*)
operator (defined in LowStar.BufferOps
) guarantees that the dereference
will be pretty-printed with a *
C dereference, as opposed to an access
at array index 0. Pointers can always be tested for nullity via the
is_null p
function, which is guaranteed to be pretty-printed as p !=
NULL
.
The modifies clauses library¶
The current heap model of F* is based on a select-update theory: the heap is reflected as a map, allocation adds a key in the map, assignment updates the map, and reading selects from the map.
Proving properties of programs therefore requires the programmer to reason about the heap model. However, stating precise post-conditions that refer to a particular heap after a particular update does not scale up to large programs: we want to reason abstractly about modifications, and use a library of composable predicates that allow one to generically reason about a given modification to the heap.
This is where the LowStar.Modifies
library comes in handy. The modifies
clauses library allows one to reason about allocation, de-allocation,
modifications using a single unified modifies
clause. An abstract notion of
a memory location allows composing predicates, and deriving properties such as:
“if I modify a location l1
disjoint from l2
, then the contents of the
memory at address l2
remain unchanged”.
Abstract memory locations
The LowStar.Modifies
library abstracts over memory locations. Memory
locations have type loc
. Locations form a monoid, where loc_none
is
the empty location and loc_union
combines two location to form the union of
the two.
Several injections exist to create locations; for now, we will mostly use
loc_buffer
, which injects a LowStar.Buffer.t
into an abstract location.
Inclusion and disjointness
The LowStar.Modifies
module provides an inclusion relation, via
loc_includes
. This allows the programmer to state, for instance, that the
location of a stack-allocated buffer is included in its stack frame.
Perhaps more useful is the loc_disjoint
predicates, which allows the
programmer to state that two memory locations do not overlap.
The modifies clause
The modifies clause is of the form modifies l h0 h1
where l
is an
abstract memory location, h0
is the initial heap and h1
is the
resulting heap. Here is an example:
module M = LowStar.Modifies
let example_modifies_callee (b1 b2: B.buffer UInt32.t) : Stack unit
(requires (fun h -> B.live h b1 /\ B.live h b2 /\ B.length b1 == 1 /\ B.length b2 == 1 /\ B.disjoint b1 b2))
(ensures (fun h _ h' ->
M.modifies (M.loc_union (M.loc_buffer b1) (M.loc_buffer b2)) h h' /\
B.live h' b1 /\ B.live h' b2 /\
B.get h' b1 0 == 18ul /\ B.get h' b2 0 == 42ul
))
= b2.(0ul) <- 42ul;
b1.(0ul) <- 18ul
The pre- and post-conditions of the example_modifies_callee
function state that, if b1
and b2
are two disjoint live
buffers of length 1, then example_modifies
changes their
contents to 18ul and 42ul, respectively. In itself, the modifies
clause tells nothing, but it starts becoming useful when the
example_modifies_callee
function is called by another
function:
let example_modifies_caller (b0: B.buffer UInt32.t) : Stack unit
(requires (fun h -> B.live h b0 /\ B.length b0 == 3))
(ensures (fun h _ h' ->
M.modifies (M.loc_buffer b0) h h' /\
B.live h' b0 /\
B.get h' b0 0 == B.get h b0 0
))
= let b1 = B.sub b0 1ul 1ul in
let b2 = B.sub b0 2ul 1ul in
example_modifies_callee b1 b2;
assert (forall h . B.get h b0 0 == B.get h (B.gsub b0 0ul 1ul) 0)
This function takes a buffer b0
of length 3, and from it,
extracts two disjoint buffers, b1
and b2
, as the
sub-buffers of b0
of length 1 at offsets 1 and 2,
respectively. Since they are both live and disjoint, they can then
be passed to example_modifies_callee
. Then, the post-condition
of example_modifies_caller
about the contents of the cell of
b0
at offset 0 is due to the fact that that cell of b0
is
disjoint from both b1
and b2
(because it is the cell of
the sub-buffer of b0
at offset 0, as suggested by the
assert
), and so, by virtue of the modifies
clause of
example_modifies_callee
, its value is preserved.